What to say when a client asks for a free pitch
A short script, plus the longer version for when the client pushes back and says everyone else does it for free.
Practical advocacy for working designers
no-spec is an editorial site for the working design profession. We argue against spec work, against AI as a shortcut to designer thinking, and for fair rates and clear contracts. We are not affiliated with the original No!Spec organization; we run a new editorial brand on the same URL because the argument still needs making, now more than ever.
01
The legacy mission. Designers asked to produce free work on speculation hurt themselves, devalue the profession, and produce worse outcomes for the clients who request it. What spec work is, who runs the contests, and what to say when a client asks.
02
An AI-generated mockup is a different form of unpaid pitch. The substitution of designer thinking for prompt engineering produces the same poor results spec contests do. How to price, scope, and disclose AI work without selling out the practice.
03
Discovery is not free design. A scope creep clause is not optional. What a working designer's rate range looks like in 2026, what a contract should say about revisions, and how to charge for thinking.
04
Arguments drawn from the field's history. What the 2008 No!Spec movement got right, what the major designer associations have said about spec and about AI, and how the two debates map onto each other.
A short script, plus the longer version for when the client pushes back and says everyone else does it for free.
The unpaid pitch did not disappear when the tooling changed. It just got faster to ask for and harder to refuse.
Overhead, downtime, software, taxes, and the unbillable hours that make the billable ones possible. The number is higher than clients think, and lower than it should be.
It named the practice, gave designers language to refuse it, and lost anyway. The reasons it lost are worth studying now.
Run the numbers on a hundred submissions and one paid winner. The client is not saving money. They are buying worse work and calling it a bargain.
Disclosure is not an apology. It is a line item, and it belongs in the contract before the first file is delivered.
The question "will you do this for free, on the chance we like it?" has gone through three forms in twenty years. It is still the same question. The answer has not changed.