Grab a

Grab a NO!SPEC logo today

 logo today!

Say NO!SPEC work!

Welcome to NO!SPEC

The NO!SPEC campaign: Serves as a vehicle to unite those who support the notion that spec work devalues the potential of design and ultimately does a disservice to the client.

Our mission: To educate the public about speculative, or 'spec' work.

Our target: Those who use creative services, as well as creative professionals (designers, photographers, illustrators, typographers, writers and those in marketing, branding and advertising).

What you can do: Read NO!SPEC's Protocols. Place a "NO!SPEC" logo on your site. Sign the NO!SPEC petition. Distribute the "NO!SPEC" posters. Contact us with your thoughts, comments, articles and insights.

Requirements: The only requirement for participation is putting the appropriate value on your profession.

Archive for May, 2006

NO!SPEC interview with RGD by Kevin Broome

From Kevin: I recently had the pleasure of speaking with Carmen von Richthofen, the Executive Director of Association of Registered Graphic Designers and John Furneaux, the President of the Association of Registered Graphic Designers and Managing Director of Karacters Design Group in Toronto about the issue of spec work and the damage that can be wrought by such practices.

The interview: Shooting oneself in the foot and other truths about designing on spec: An interview with Carmen von Richthofen and John Furneaux of the RGD.

Comments

SPEC!FREE: GDUSA awards

2006 AMERICAN GRAPHIC DESIGN AWARDS
DEADLINE: MAY 26, 2006

The editors of Graphic Design USA invite you to join the thousands of creative professionals who have won awards in this national design competition over its three decade history. The competition is open to everyone in the community: advertising agencies, design firms, corporate, institutional and publishing inhouse departments, and more. It honors outstanding new work of all kinds: print, packaging, point-of-purchase, internet, interactive and motion graphics.

Comments

Protected: Sun Announces Contest
for Grid App Developers

This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:


Comments off

Andy Rutledge on NO!SPEC

Redesign Competitions: looking for a commitment or just a roll in the hay?

When looking for someone to spend the rest of your life with, a hot bod and a willingness to put out are not exactly the appropriate exclusive criteria for selection. They might be part of the package, but they’re largely irrelevant to the fundamental and foundational issues involved with healthy relationships. Those issues are far more complex and far more meaningful.

It’s no different for a company’s site redesign effort. Mere “eye-catching design” from designers willing to produce work without hope of compensation is not exactly the sort of thing that meets a company’s vital and complex online presence needs. Nor is this willingness a good indication of the quality of the solution or the professionalism of the individuals involved. In fact, this behavior indicates quite the opposite for both the company and the participants.

To read the rest of the article, go to Andy Rutledge’s Redesign Competitions: looking for a commitment or just a roll in the hay?

Comments

Mark Boulton on NO!SPEC

Wikipedia and Bowing to the Brand

Wikipedia are having a design competition.

Whilst it doesn’t come as a complete shock that a site which offers free content is after free work, I’m still reeling from the opportunity that this presents to some designers, and recoiling from the effect this type of project has on the industry.

A while ago, I did some work for a Music TeleVision network. I’ve also done some work for some other pretty big brands in my time as a designer. The one thing that is pretty much constant with all of these big brands is an element of brand worship. You are expected to, as a supplier, bend over backwards in order to pander to their needs (because they’re big, right? And you need them much more than they need you). Now, a lot of you would say that’s the way we should all be for our clients right? Well, yes and no. For me, it comes down to respect.

To read further, go to Wikipedia and Bowing to the Brand

Comments

Writers Ask Minister to Rein in TVNZ

Writers Ask Minister to Rein in TVNZ
Media Release from the New Zealand Writers Guild

12 May 2006

The New Zealand Writers Guild have asked Minister of Broadcasting Steve Maharey to amend the terms of an in-house competition being run by TVNZ.

The Life’s a Pitch contest invites TVNZ staff to pitch programme ideas to the content department. TVNZ takes the copyright to all entries it chooses to use but provides no payment to the creators. In the real world, when TVNZ commissions a show any creator could potentially expect to receive thousands of dollars.

Said Guild Executive Director Dominic Sheehan “We requested that the Minister require that TVNZ allow all entrants to retain the copyright to their entries. TVNZ will be free to contract for the rights, but at least then any creator will be able to negotiate for fair rates and conditions for their work.”

TVNZ’s own Charter requires them to ‘support and promote the talents and creative resources of New Zealanders and of the independent New Zealand film industry’. Sheehan points out “How is not paying people for their work supportive? TVNZ are wilfully breaching their own Charter. It is the government’s job to ensure that the terms of this Charter are adhered to which is why we’ve asked the Minister to intervene.”

“TVNZ keep calling this contest ‘a bit of fun’ but in fact their actions amount to a rights grab. It’s akin to copyright theft and that’s no fun at all.“

For further comment contact: Dominic Sheehan 021 707 344.

Comments

Freshly Squeezed Droplets on NO!SPEC

Answers Against Contests and Spec Work

From Robert Wurth: On this blog, in online forums, and on the NO!SPEC web site, I’ve been rather vocal about my opinion, and opposition to, speculative work and design contests. I know that I’m not alone in my opinion, but even so, these practices persist and have plenty of supporters.

Two common questions asked in response to speaking out against spec work and contests are, “why do you care?” and “who is it harming?”

I thought it would be worthwhile to answer those questions here …

To read more, go to Robert’s article Answers Against Contests and Spec Work

Comments

American Design Awards on NO!SPEC

Say NO to Speculative Work
By Art Javid and NO!SPEC

“Speculative Work” is the unfortunate practice in today’s society by certain companies or organizations that put on a “contest”, asking hundreds of graphic designers to participate by designing, and sharing their ideas or work specific to the project, and promising the “winner” a meager payoff if their work is selected or used by the company.

Often, hundreds of younger, inexperienced designers put in countless hours of work and creativity designing logos, web sites, or marketing collateral for these types of contests, without knowing if they will ever be compensated fairly for their time and efforts; 99% of these contestants never will.

To read the rest, go to the American Design Awards Newsletter.

Thanks Art!

Comments

Protected: iStock BuyRequest™

This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:


Comments off

Designer Jeff Andrews whips up a 5 pack to go!

Oregon designer Jeff Andrews, of Jeff Andrews Design, has donated 5 new posters to NO!SPEC.

A strong supporter of the NO!SPEC cause, Jeff devotes much of his spare time to furthering education in his own community regarding speculative work.

Jeff is an award-winning designer located in Roseburg, Oregon. He is also the mastermind behind the “Design” Inspiration site and Sugar Frosted Goodness!

Comments (1)

« Previous entries