<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NO!SPEC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nospec.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nospec.com</link>
	<description>To educate the public about speculative (spec) work</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 11:53:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The dangers of speculative design</title>
		<link>http://www.nospec.com/the-dangers-of-speculative-design</link>
		<comments>http://www.nospec.com/the-dangers-of-speculative-design#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 17:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NoSpec</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spec Conversation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nospec.com/?p=2262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lisa Barrett of Birmingham-based Sixth Story published the studio&#8217;s experience of speculative design, where the &#8220;pitches&#8221; they ultimately lost ended up looking very similar to the designs that were actually used. &#8220;We produced some branding work, name generation and packaging &#8230; <a href="http://www.nospec.com/the-dangers-of-speculative-design">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://twitter.com/lisabarrett_" title="Lisa Barrett on Twitter">Lisa Barrett</a> of Birmingham-based <a href="http://www.sixthstory.co.uk/" title="Sixth Story">Sixth Story</a> published the studio&#8217;s experience of speculative design, where the &#8220;pitches&#8221; they ultimately lost ended up looking very similar to the designs that were actually used.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;We produced some branding work, name generation and packaging concepts for a start up business in order for them to secure funding and investment to take a product to market. We agreed that if the product was successful in going into the production stage we would be the sole design agency and all work done to that date would be billable.</p>
<p>&#8220;It turned out that wasn’t to be the case and in fact our initial brand and product packaging ideas would be taken to the manufacturer for their in house designers to work with, and we wouldn’t be paid.</p>
<p>&#8220;A month or so later we find our work featuring on the website of the individual, with no accreditation or mention of our contribution. They even took our ideas and found themselves on a well known BBC programme.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><img src="http://www.nospec.com/images/copied-design/sixth-story-spec-design.jpg" alt="Sixth Story spec design" /><br />
<em><small>Sixth Story design work</small></em></p>
<p>Read the full post on the Sixth Story blog: <a href="http://www.sixthstory.co.uk/blog/the-dangers-of-speculative-work/" title="The dangers of speculative design">The dangers of speculative design</a>.</p>
<p>Via <a href="http://www.twitter.com/MatDolphin/status/332528338830761984" title="Mat Dolphin on Twitter">@MatDolphin</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nospec.com/the-dangers-of-speculative-design/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Powerhouse Museum tries crowdsourcing for Sydney Design, then pulls contest</title>
		<link>http://www.nospec.com/powerhouse-museum-sydney-design</link>
		<comments>http://www.nospec.com/powerhouse-museum-sydney-design#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 08:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NoSpec</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crowdsourcing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nospec.com/?p=2232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;People are free to decide what they do with the efforts of designers of any stripe – that’s entirely ok. But when a publicly funded organisation (whose entire justification for their funding, and thus their existence, turns on promoting and &#8230; <a href="http://www.nospec.com/powerhouse-museum-sydney-design">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;People are free to decide what they do with the efforts of designers of any stripe – that’s entirely ok. But when a publicly funded organisation (whose entire justification for their funding, and thus their existence, turns on promoting and championing design) chooses a crowdsourcing model, it’s incredibly disappointing to say the least.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Quoted from this considered piece on desktop magazine:</p>
<p><a href="http://desktopmag.com.au/blogs/opinion-with-friends-like-these-who-needs-enemies/" title="With friends like these, who needs enemies?">With friends like these, who needs enemies?</a></p>
<p>Written by <a href="http://www.clintonduncan.com/" title="Clinton Duncan">Clinton Duncan</a>.</p>
<p>The contest has since been pulled from the crowdsourcing website, due in part to the quality of many of the poster entries that were submitted (archived <a href="http://www.limeworks.com.au/-general/crowdsourcing_design_for_a_design_celebration_an_industry_up_in_arms" title="Limeworks">here on Limeworks</a>).</p>
<p><img src="http://www.nospec.com/images/contest-entries/sydney-design-poster-01.jpg" alt="Sydney Design poster" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nospec.com/powerhouse-museum-sydney-design/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Crowdsourcing to Support American Jobs?</title>
		<link>http://www.nospec.com/obama-crowdsourcing-to-support-american-jobs</link>
		<comments>http://www.nospec.com/obama-crowdsourcing-to-support-american-jobs#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2011 04:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NoSpec</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crowdsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[designers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.no-spec.com/?p=2047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A tweet from Niki Bivona (@nikibivona) on Twitter says it all: RT @nospec http://my.barackobama.com/page/s/artworks-submission Obama is now crowdsourcing a poster, about job creation. Irony. Obama, if you aim to support American jobs, then perhaps paying designers to create your campaign &#8230; <a href="http://www.nospec.com/obama-crowdsourcing-to-support-american-jobs">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A tweet from <a href="http://nikibivona.com/">Niki Bivona</a> (<a href="http://www.twitter.com/nikibivona">@nikibivona</a>) on Twitter says it all: </p>
<blockquote><p>RT @nospec <a href="http://my.barackobama.com/page/s/artworks-submission" title="Obama crowdsourcing?">http://my.barackobama.com/page/s/artworks-submission</a> Obama is now crowdsourcing a poster, about job creation. Irony.</p></blockquote>
<p>Obama, if you aim to support American jobs, then perhaps paying designers to create your campaign posters would be a good start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nospec.com/obama-crowdsourcing-to-support-american-jobs/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Department of Interior is Crowdsourcing their Logo?</title>
		<link>http://www.nospec.com/us-department-of-interior-is-crowdsourcing-their-logo</link>
		<comments>http://www.nospec.com/us-department-of-interior-is-crowdsourcing-their-logo#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 13:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NoSpec</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crowdsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[designers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logo design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.no-spec.com/?p=2003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a petition found via Twitter that you might be interested in. @LogoMotives Petition: Stop the US Department of @Interior from Crowdsourcing a Logo &#124; @nospec #nospec &#124; http://bit.ly/NOSPEC-DOI OVERVIEW The U.S. Department of the Interior currently has posted a &#8230; <a href="http://www.nospec.com/us-department-of-interior-is-crowdsourcing-their-logo">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a petition found via Twitter that you might be interested in. </p>
<p><a href="http://twitter.com/LogoMotives">@LogoMotives</a> Petition: Stop the US Department of @Interior from Crowdsourcing a Logo | <a href="http://twitter.com/nospec">@nospec</a> #nospec | <a href="http://www.change.org/petitions/us-department-of-the-interior-stop-the-us-department-of-interior-from-crowdsourcing-a-logo">http://bit.ly/NOSPEC-DOI</a></p>
<blockquote><p>OVERVIEW<br />
The U.S. Department of the Interior currently has posted a design brief on crowdspring.com (http://www.crowdspring.com/project/2296807_logo-us-department-of-the-interior/details/) asking for graphic designers to work for free in order to try to &#8216;win&#8217; the prize of being paid for logo design and branding work. This is outrageous, especially coming from a branch of the U.S. Government.</p>
<p>We are against crowdsourcing of logos due to the harm it typically does the company or organization as well as the damage it does to the general public&#8217;s understanding of the Graphic Design profession and the amount of work that really goes into logo development and branding. A branch of our U.S. Government supporting such practices is upsetting to us all. While crowdsourcing may appear like a win-win scenario on the surface for any company or organization, there are many reasons this may backfire and cause more harm than good.</p></blockquote>
<p>Read the rest here: <a href="http://www.change.org/petitions/us-department-of-the-interior-stop-the-us-department-of-interior-from-crowdsourcing-a-logo">Stop the US Department of Interior from Crowdsourcing a Logo</a></p>
<p>The petition is there. Our signature is too. Yours?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nospec.com/us-department-of-interior-is-crowdsourcing-their-logo/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No More Spec Shooting!</title>
		<link>http://www.nospec.com/no-more-spec-shooting</link>
		<comments>http://www.nospec.com/no-more-spec-shooting#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2011 02:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NoSpec</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NO!SPEC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conferences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No more spec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photographers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SPAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SPAA Convention]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.no-spec.com/?p=1984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you plan on being in Las Vegas this Sunday, Ben Chen is scheduled to speak at the SPAA Convention. SPAA: stands for Sports Photographers Association of America. No More Spec Shooting! Sunday, February 20, 2011, 1:30 p.m. &#8211; 5:00 &#8230; <a href="http://www.nospec.com/no-more-spec-shooting">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you plan on being in Las Vegas this Sunday, <a href="http://www.socalpixels.com/blog/?p=7783">Ben Chen</a> is scheduled to speak at the <a href="http://www.pmai.org/pspa-spaa2011/">SPAA Convention</a>. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.pmai.org/spaa/">SPAA:</a> stands for <em>Sports Photographers Association of America</em>.</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.pmai.org/PSPA-SPAA-Conf.aspx?id=20933">No More Spec Shooting!</a><br />
Sunday, February 20, 2011, 1:30 p.m. &#8211; 5:00 p.m.<br />
After more than 10 years of speculative shooting of several youth sports, Ben Chen was tired of spending 100 percent of his resources on 10 percent of the buying customers. So he began to shoot only when parents had prepaid for their kids. Chen has helped his already successful youth sports business become even more profitable. Come and learn how this is done so you can also say, &#8220;No more spec shooting!&#8221;<br />
Speaker: Ben Chen, Action Snapshots Inc.</p></blockquote>
<p>Good luck Ben, and please get back to us when the conference is over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nospec.com/no-more-spec-shooting/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
