SW01
What is spec work? A plain definition for designers and clients
Spec work is design done for free in the hope of being paid. Here is how to spot it, when unpaid work is different, and what to say instead.
SW 01Contents
The short answer. Spec work is design done for free, before anyone has agreed to pay, in the hope of winning the job or a prize. It shows up as pitches with original concepts, crowdsourced contests, unpaid "test projects" and, more and more, quick generated comps; the profession's associations advise against all of them.
"Spec" is short for speculative. The designer speculates their time on an outcome they do not control. This page defines the term, lists the forms it takes, explains why the field pushes back, and gives you words to use when someone asks. For the wider argument and history, start at the spec work hub.
What is spec work, exactly?
Spec work is creative work produced before a paid agreement exists, on the chance that it leads to payment. The AIGA position on spec work defines it as "work done for free, in hopes of getting paid for it," and separates it from competitions, volunteer work, internships and pro bono work.
Canada's Association of Registered Graphic Designers uses a narrower, pitch-focused definition: "providing design services to develop creative concept work for free (or for a nominal fee) as part of a new business pitch." Its spec work resources page also states that the RGD Code of Ethics prevents its members from working on spec. Note the phrase "nominal fee": a token payment does not turn spec into a paid job.
The test that works in practice is simple. Ask two questions. Is the work original and made for this client's actual problem? Has anyone agreed, in writing, to pay for it? If the first answer is yes and the second is no, it is spec.
What forms does spec work take?
The request rarely uses the word. It arrives dressed as a pitch, a contest, a trial or a quick favour. The table sorts the common versions.
| Request | What is asked for | Spec? | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Competitive pitch with concepts | Original designs for the client's brief before a contract | Yes | Original work, no agreement to pay |
| Crowdsourced design contest | Many finished entries, one paid winner | Yes | Every losing entry is unpaid original work |
| "Test project" or "free trial" | A sample on the client's real brand or brief | Usually | Produces usable original work for free |
| Hiring homework | Assignments as a condition of an interview | Usually | Same work, framed as recruitment |
| Generated comps in a pitch | Quick mockups made with image generators | Yes | Cheaper to make, still unpaid concept work |
| Uniform skills test | A short, standard exercise unrelated to live work | No | No original work for the client's use |
| Pro bono by choice | Free work for a cause you pick | No | You chose it, with no competition for a prize |
| Paid discovery or paid pitch | Concepts or research for an agreed fee | No | A paid engagement, however small the scope |
The hiring version deserves a closer look. The Graphic Artists Guild calls hiring homework "work on spec at its worst" and separates it from proficiency tests that are uniform, limited in scope and time, and do not result in original work. That distinction is a fair one to use with recruiters.
The newest version is the generated comp. Image generators make a dozen logo directions cheap to produce, so some clients now expect them up front. Cheaper to make does not mean paid. We cover this in AI mockups as the new unpaid pitch.
Why does the design profession object to spec work?
AIGA lists three risks. Clients risk compromised quality, because spec skips the research, the weighing of alternatives and the testing that make design work. Designers risk being taken advantage of, and the practice "diminishes the true economic value" of what they contribute. Both sides carry legal risk over intellectual property, trademark and trade dress.
The Graphic Artists Guild's Code of Fair Practice, first published in 1948 and revised in 1989, makes the cost plain in Article 29: designers who accept speculative assignments "risk losing anticipated fees, expenses, and the potential opportunity to pursue other, rewarding assignments." The Code leaves the choice to each artist, but it names the price.
We set out the full case, including what spec costs the client, in ten reasons designers refuse spec work. If you want a number for your own situation, the spec work cost calculator turns your hours and rate into the value of an unpaid pitch.
When is unpaid design work not spec?
Not every free hour is spec. AIGA is explicit that many designers choose unpaid work for good reasons, and that the designer and client decide and carry the risk. Three cases sit outside the definition:
- Pro bono by choice. You pick a cause, set the scope and give the work. Nobody is collecting free concepts from ten designers and paying one.
- Your own portfolio projects. A self-initiated rebrand of an imaginary company, or a type specimen you wanted to make, is practice and promotion. Label it as personal work.
- Genuine skills tests. Short, standard, unrelated to live work, and the same for every candidate.
The line is control. When you decide to give work away, it is generosity. When someone else arranges for many designers to give work away so they can pick one, it is spec.
What should you say instead of yes?
Say no to the free concepts and yes to a paid first step. Most clients asking for spec want reassurance that you can solve their problem, and you can offer that without giving the solution away. Three alternatives work well:
- A portfolio walkthrough. Show two past projects close to their problem and explain how you got there.
- A paid discovery phase. A fixed fee for research, a brief and a direction. It is small enough to approve quickly. Price it with the freelance design rate calculator.
- A paid shortlist. If they must compare designers, each finalist is paid for concept work.
A reply you can adapt:
Thanks for thinking of me for this. I don't produce concepts before
we have an agreement, because good concepts come out of research
I haven't done yet. What I can do this week: walk you through two
projects close to yours, then quote a short paid discovery phase.
If it isn't a fit after that, you keep the research.
AIGA also publishes a sample letter for designers and firms explaining why speculative proposals compromise the work, linked from its position page.
Frequently asked questions
Is a free test project spec work?
Usually, yes. If the test asks for original work on a real brief, it is spec work under a different name. The Graphic Artists Guild draws the line at uniform, limited skills tests that do not produce original work; anything beyond that should be paid.
Is spec work illegal?
In general, no. Spec work is a business practice both sides can agree to, so the objection is professional and economic. The Graphic Artists Guild notes that unpaid hiring homework can raise wage-law questions; ask a lawyer about your own case. Some associations go further: the RGD Code of Ethics bars its members from doing spec work.
Does a small pitch fee stop it being spec?
Not necessarily. The RGD definition covers concept work done for free or for a nominal fee. A fee that pays for a fraction of the hours is a discount on spec, not a paid engagement.
Can I do spec work for my portfolio?
Self-initiated projects are not spec, because nobody else is collecting the value. Make up a brief, label it as a personal project, and do not use a real company's marks without permission.
What to do this week
- Save the reply above as a text snippet so you answer the next spec request in a minute, not an evening.
- Put a price on a small paid discovery phase now, before anyone asks.
- Run your last unpaid pitch through the spec work calculator to see what it cost you.
- Read our spec work and freelance design FAQ for short answers on rates, contracts and AI.